CASE FILE ENTRY // MATERIAL FAILURE LOG
Every defect has a story.
These case studies are fictionalized representations of real-world challenges I encountered in high-precision forging environments. Under the guidance of corporate metallurgists and NDT technicians, I traced failures back to their rootsβinvestigating metallurgical issues like voids, porosity, and inclusions, and evaluating non-destructive testing methods and process flow.
Each reconstruction reflects how I approached failure analysis from the ground up, turning anomalies into actionable insightβwhile protecting client confidentiality under NDA .
π§ͺ Metallographic Simulations β Aluminum Alloy
π¦ Subsurface Void Investigation β Aluminum Alloy
- Objective: Investigate machining shifts; voids found near the material boundary.
- Material: Aluminum alloy (simulated)
- Methodology: Cross-sectioned, polished, and examined under 20x lens
Findings:
- Void approx. 0.0004 in wide
- Located near outer edge β likely formed during casting or rolling
Interpretation: Subsurface voids at the billet edge may shift tooling or cause vibration during machining, compromising tolerance. Detection early in the billet lifecycle enables upstream process control.
Outcome: Helped adjust process control parameters for billet manufacturing.
β οΈ All visuals are fictionalized simulations and are NDA-safe educational content.
π» Corrosion Comparison Dashboard
Compare common corrosion and failure types in aluminum and steel alloys. Learn visual cues, estimated depths, and forge-related causes to better diagnose material integrity issues.
β« Pitting Corrosion β 6261-T6 Aluminum
Localized corrosion initiating at grain boundaries or reheated zones in aluminum billets.
π Pit dimensions: 41.2β―Β΅m Γ 16.6β―Β΅m
π Visual cue: Isolated elliptical void with dark rim, often adjacent to microstructural transitions.
π Cause: Poor passivation + chloride exposure + thermal cycling (especially in wet forge environments).
π Surface Corrosion β 304 Stainless Steel
Uniform corrosion with even material loss. Passive chromium oxide layer deteriorates in high-moisture or chloride environments.
π Depth: ~54.9β―Β΅m
π Visual cue: Smooth matte finish, etched grain texture, no isolated pits.
π Cause: Long-term exposure + humidity + uncoated storage β commonly observed in parts left outside prior to machining or welding.
π΅ Advanced Surface Attack β Steel Alloy
Trench-like corrosion with jagged, structural loss. Accelerated by press misalignment, coating failure, and environmental contamination.
π Depth: ~129.5β―Β΅m
β οΈ Visual cue: Rough-edged void, often spanning multiple grains or wall surfaces.
π Cause: Coating breakdown + mechanical stress + electrolyte pooling during storage or forming.
𧲠Galvanic Corrosion β Bimetallic Joint
Dissimilar metals in electrical contact corrode at different rates. Common in bolted assemblies with aluminum and stainless steel.
π© Visual cue: Corrosion halo at fastener or joint contact.
β‘ Cause: Electrochemical potential difference + electrolyte presence.
βͺ Hydrogen Embrittlement β High-Strength Steel
Atomic hydrogen diffuses into the metal lattice, causing delayed cracking under stress. Often occurs during acid cleaning or plating of hardened components.
β‘ Visual cue: Subsurface cracks or brittle fracture in high-strength parts.
π Cause: Hydrogen absorption combined with tensile stress.
π Quick Comparison Table
Material | Corrosion Type | Depth / Risk | Visual Cue | Cause |
---|---|---|---|---|
6261-T6 Al | Pitting | 41.2 Γ 16.6β―Β΅m | Isolated elliptical void | Clβ ingress + thermal cycling |
304 S.S. | Surface Attack | ~54.9β―Β΅m | Matte grain etch | Humidity + oxide breakdown |
Steel Alloy | Trench Corrosion | ~129.5β―Β΅m | Jagged trench void | Mechanical + coating failure |
Al/Stl Joint | Galvanic | Variable | Halo at fastener zone | Electrochemical mismatch |
High-Strength Steel | Embrittlement | Crack propagation | Subsurface fracture | Hydrogen + stress |
Simulated reference cases β NDA-safe visuals.
π¬ Alpha Case in Titanium β Root Cause & Visuals
Alpha case is a brittle, oxygen-enriched surface layer found in titanium alloys after high-temperature exposure. It must be minimized in aerospace and critical applications.
It forms when oxygen diffuses into titanium at forging or heat treat temperatures above 1000Β°F. While it can reduce ductility and fatigue life, not all alpha case is catastrophic. If within allowable limits (typically β€0.002"), it may be tolerable or removable through surface finishing processes. Judgment depends on location, depth, and application criticality.
π§ͺ Simulated Microstructural Snapshots
- Material: Ti-6Al-4V alloy (forged, NDA-safe simulation)
- Prep: Polished, etched, illuminated under LED ring
- Magnification: 20x objective lens
- Focus: Identify oxidized surface depth and grain boundary patterns
Connect with Meβ
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/audrey-enriquez-382b9b201
Email: audreyenriquez98@gmail.com
Β© 2025 Audrey Enriquez.
All content is shared for educational and documentation purposes only.
No proprietary or confidential information is disclosed. All rights reserved.